He pointed out how several works of art depicting the biblical tale seemed to have a little gay representation.
A Canadian writer left the internet cackling a few years ago when he shared an interesting little detail he'd noticed in most depictions of Noah's Ark. In a now-viral Twitter thread, Anthony Oliveira—a "National Magazine, Reads Rainbow, and GLAAD award-winning author, film programmer, pop culture critic, and Ph.D. living in Toronto"—pointed out how several works of art depicting the biblical tale seemed to have a little gay representation. For those who aren't familiar with the Genesis flood narrative, Noah's Arc follows the tale of a guy—named Noah—who built a boat as per God's orders after he was told the entire world was to be washed off in a massive flood.
oh man this week's episode is about NOAH'S ARK so we get ONE CHANCE* (*actually two) to pick our FAVOURITE WORK OF ART DEPICTING IT!
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
what is everyone's pick
Noah is also tasked with the assignment of filling the arc with male and female specimens of all the world's species of animals, so that they may reproduce and multiply in the post-flood world. While most depictions of Noah's arc carrying pairs of different species get it right for elephants, chickens, zebras, cows, giraffes, goats, ducks, fish, etc, they almost always seemed to deviate from the requirements when it came to lions. Instead of featuring a lion and a lioness, Oliveria noticed, many paintings showed off two lions with full manes, which are, of course, male.
i love that noah's ark is ubiquitously The One We Tell To Children bc it is full of cute animals and a big boat and a rainbow and the
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
apocalyptic mass extinction of life on earth pic.twitter.com/NBpNud1v9M
Take a closer look at this one, for example:
this artist remembered that there are boy-chickens and girl-chickens but let their guard down with the lions i fear pic.twitter.com/bvyW42NVY8
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
And this:
the error is...systemic to the genre it seems pic.twitter.com/DOsvp3E4Rr
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
There's more:
here we see: additional gay lions pic.twitter.com/rxvxCkWN9J
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
Whoops!
these lions are in fact visually distinct, but i think the male is still gay.... pic.twitter.com/JtobOIqxIn
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
Oliveria also found one that seemed to have attempted to avoid this gay lion trope but took the overcorrection a bit too far so that what may have been supposed to be a female lion looks a little more like a tiger. This, of course, raises a whole range of other questions.
this one feels like an overcorrection pic.twitter.com/6hQtBin48p
— Anthony Oliveira (@meakoopa) June 11, 2019
Oliveira ends his thread by declaring the entire tale of Noah's Arc the epitome of queerness. "Lesbian cows, gay lions, masc-presenting peacock pairs, and herds of unicorns - I think what we've learned is that when Christians whine that we 'stole the rainbow' from them, we should remind them that their art of the Noah story has always been queer as heck," he wrote. By calling attention to the subtle but meaningful details of the artworks, Oliveira ignited a storm of questions and comments about the tale. Here are some of our favorite Twitter reactions to the thread:
Speaking as a childcare professional, there is nobody who loves anything more than kids love narratives where large numbers of characters are flippantly killed off.
— emmet l.f. cameron (@emlfc) June 11, 2019
I really like how even though the fish are in the water, there are still 2 of each one
— Lucretiel 🦀 (@Lucretiel) June 11, 2019
Why does nobody show the 900,000 species of insects? 🧐
— THEE VP speaks for me (@as_joyful) June 12, 2019