NEWS
LIFESTYLE
FUNNY
WHOLESOME
INSPIRING
ANIMALS
RELATIONSHIPS
PARENTING
WORK
SCIENCE AND NATURE
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
SCOOP UPWORTHY is part of
GOOD Worldwide Inc. publishing
family.
© GOOD Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Trump is using your tax dollars to fight a sexual assault allegation by E Jean Carroll

The extraordinary move has been highly criticized by taxpayers and experts alike, but Attorney General William Barr still stands by it.

Trump is using your tax dollars to fight a sexual assault allegation by E Jean Carroll
Image Source: Getty/ (L) White House Coronavirus Task Force Holds Daily Briefing At The White House. (Photo by Alex Wong) (R) 2019 Glamour Women Of The Year Summit. (Photo by Astrid Stawia)

The United States Department of Justice on Tuesday asked to take over the defense for President Donald Trump in a defamation lawsuit filed against him by E Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault last year. The request is especially extraordinary as the incident in question took place before Trump assumed his position in the White House. Under typical circumstances, the President would be expected to fight his defense by hiring private attorneys. However, the Justice Department has argued that it must take over as Trump's comments spurring the defamation lawsuit were made while he was in office, CNN reports.

 



 

 

The move means citizens' tax money will be used to fight Trump's lawsuit, a reality that not many taxpayers are satisfied with. It also comes at a time when the Justice Department has received immense backlash for acting in the President's personal interests rather than in the interest of the American people. The department's court filing stated, "President Trump was acting within the scope of his office as President of the United States at the time of the incidents out of which the Plaintiff's defamation claim arose. Indeed, when providing the challenged statements, the President was speaking to or responding to inquiries from the press, much as the elected officials in the cases cited above were speaking to the press or making other public statements at the time of their challenged actions. The Westfall Act accordingly requires the substitution of the United States as [a] defendant in this action."

 



 

 

Roberta Kaplan, Carroll's attorney, claimed that the argument from the Department of Justice was "shocking" even in today's world, referring to Trump's America. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig was in agreement with the attorney's stance, calling the move "a wild stretch by DOJ," especially at a time when the department and Attorney General William Barr are already under severe criticism for actions that may have benefitted Trump's political standing. "I can't remotely conceive how DOJ can argue with a straight face that it is somehow within the official duties of the President to deny a claim that he committed sexual assault years before he took office," Honig affirmed. "This is very much consistent with Barr's well-established pattern of distorting fact and law to protect Trump and his allies: the Mueller report, Ukraine, Stone, Flynn, [the] firing of the SDNY US Attorney and, more recently, baseless claims about widespread mail-in ballot fraud."

 



 

 

Carroll, who worked for Elle Magazine as an advice columnist for several years, filed a lawsuit last fall alleging that President Trump had in the 1990s sexually assaulted her in a dressing room at the luxury Manhattan department store Bergdorf Goodman where she was employed at the time. Of course, Trump denied the allegation. He said it was "totally false" and added that he "never met this person in my life." Now, the change of lawyers could result in the case being delayed. Alternatively, it may not even go to trial at all because the federal government cannot, according to CNN legal analyst and University of Texas law school professor Steve Vladeck, be sued for defamation. In a statement, Carroll shared, "Today's actions demonstrate that Trump will do everything possible, including using the full powers of the federal government, to block discovery from going forward in my case before the upcoming election to try to prevent a jury from ever deciding which one of us is lying."

 



 

More Stories on Scoop