Landowners and tenants more often than not, have strained relationships owing to a lot of factors. They can sometimes amplify into situations like these.
Landlords often don't get along with their tenants as they constantly believe that renting their house means they still hold absolute control. Reddit user u/LeatherSeveral7614 has sparked a debate about the responsibilities of tenants and landlords in a peculiar situation. The tenant lives in a basement suite and found themselves in a baffling predicament when their landlord demanded they pay over $8,000 in medical bills for their child's unexpected tumble into a running dryer. This incident raises questions about the lines of responsibility and morality when it comes to such unforeseeable accidents.
The tenant describes the living arrangement, which includes a shared laundry room adjacent to their basement suite. Every week, the landlord unlocks the door connecting the suite to the laundry room, allowing the tenant to access the room for a day. Generally, the tenant closes the door to the laundry room to avoid hearing the noise. In one instance, there was an unanticipated disturbance while the tenant was in the laundry room drying their clothing. The yelling surprised the tenant and they were shocked to see that an ambulance had come to the scene. The tenant soon discovered that the landlord's 4-year-old child had managed to open the dryer and climbed inside.
The unexpected part of the story is that the dryer was defective; when the door was opened, it did not shut off, which allowed the kid to fall inside while the door was open. Luckily, the kid managed to escape with no serious injuries. However, the landlords are now requesting payment for the $8,477.34 they paid for their son's ambulance and hospital bills. The landlord is asking for the money because their kid went on an unexpected journey in the laundry room of the tenant. The tenant is hesitant to take the blame for the child's accident. They contended that since they were already making a sizable rent payment, they should not be responsible for watching the landlord's child. They also stress that the landlord is the rightful owner of the malfunctioning dryer.
The tenant turned to a landlord-oriented forum to seek advice and received mixed responses from people. While some supported the tenant, most people stated that he should just pay the money. They also say that the landowner was kind enough not to increase the rent after 1 year and 4 months, so the tenant can just pay the medical bills on moral grounds. The comment section of this post was slightly different. Some, like u/OrcEight, firmly supported the tenant, saying, "NTA. Your landlords and the people at the forum are completely wrong. It was not your responsibility to watch the child. They are the ones who were negligent by not watching their 4-year-old child and having a defective dryer."
u/Ok_Yesterday_6214 echoed this sentiment, adding, "NTA, it's their kid they should have watched and their dryer they should have fixed and their problem they don't pay insurance. I assume your lease doesn't say you should stand there and watch your clothes dry? If not, they have no right to complain."
While u/Historical_Divide673 supported the tenant and shared, "Their house, their dryer, their kid…I don't know how anyone could think you were responsible. And who owns a home, makes rental income from it, but doesn’t have health insurance for their kid?? And leaves the kid unsupervised while he climbs into a dryer? They sound irresponsible."