The CEO hadn't even read the candidate's resume, but when he started personal questions, the candidate was instantly put off by the company

Being in a higher position of authority doesn’t give someone the permission to be rude and flippant towards another. When rude behavior materializes in a corporate interviewer, it not only taints the company’s reputation but also makes the job candidate become skeptical of the company’s culture and resistant to being a part of it. In a July 6, 2026, Reddit post, a job seeker (u/schrodingers-canary) shared an interview episode where they encountered an impudent and flagrantly rude CEO who made their interview experience a bummer. In the end, the candidate used the company’s existing Wikipedia page to pay the piper.
Got a toxic interviewer's company website deleted from Wikipedia
by u/schrodingers-canary in pettyrevenge
As they described in the post, the harrowing interview lasted for about ten minutes. During the interview, the CEO grilled them with boorish behavior, asking questions that were unrelated to the job role and trying to dig out personal information about former co-workers. When the interview wrapped up and the candidate checked Glassdoor, they realized that it was filled with dozens of hateful remarks about the CEO. They decided to give him and the company the justice they deserved. The company’s existing Wikipedia page came to their rescue.

It was less of an informative page and more of a marketing brochure. A notability tag on the page said that it didn’t meet Wikipedia’s guidelines and criteria for inclusion. It seemed that the editors had been rewriting and changing information to present a biased version of the company to make it look good. The candidate clicked on the “proposed deletion” tag, and seven days later, the page was automatically deleted. According to their description, they experienced a “frisson of delight” after seeing the page go.

Reddit said they did the right thing given that a negative interview experience can leave a job seeker frustrated and discouraged, often affecting their job search. The Boston Consulting Group surveyed 90,000 people across 160 countries and found that 52% of the candidates are likely to decline an attractive job offer if their interview experience is negative. In a comment, they revealed that while the company’s website still exists, it is a zombie site and there is no mention of the company anywhere else on the internet.

According to a survey by SHL Labs, cited by Forbes, 42% of candidates decline job offers following a bad or negative interview experience. Almost half of the negative hiring experience reviews shared by the candidates attributed the interviewer as the contributing factor. The London School of Economics and Political Science suggested that an interviewer’s rude behavior comes under the category of incivility, and it can strongly reduce a job seeker’s interest in getting employed in a particular company.


u/Glitteryglitters2304 commented, “Now that’s sweet petty revenge with a pocket full of satisfaction.” u/Strange_One_3790 said, “Hopefully they went out of business then.” u/ps_va said, “Given that every toxic CEO reading the sub would go and check in panic if their company Wikipedia exists, I think you may have taken revenge on more than one. Good job!”
HR shouts at job applicant for missing interview — then realizes it was their own mistake
Man declines plum job after spotting red flag during interview with new employers, sparks debate